- 5d mark iii vs 6d autofocus pro#
- 5d mark iii vs 6d autofocus iso#
- 5d mark iii vs 6d autofocus download#
You may not modify, edit, or use these images for any purpose without a notarized contract.
5d mark iii vs 6d autofocus download#
You may click to download the original images for your personal review, but you must delete them after viewing. While these are my outtake images, these are all copyright Ron Martinsen – 2013 and ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. There is no cropping, adjustments or anything, so please excuse the well known flaws in all of the images.
These images are the original in-camera JPEG images that have been exported as originals from Lightroom with no modifications. Studio ImagesĮxcept where noted, all of the following images were shot in a studio using my Elinchrom lighting setup.
5d mark iii vs 6d autofocus pro#
I still think you’ll want Photomatix or HDR Efex Pro if you want to do any serious HDR work. To me this feels just marginally better than the s110 and G15, so this feature shouldn’t be a major influence on your purchase decision. HDR enabled with Auto “Adjust dyn range” and Auto Image Align enabled resulted in an image that addressed the blown out flower in the background at the expense of both noise and detail/pop of the subject flower. Here’s a quick snapshot of a non-HDR image (no highlight tone priority either): Resulted in an impressive in-camera result In-Camera HDR
5d mark iii vs 6d autofocus iso#
ISO 12,800 – Even nasty situations like strong shadows ISO 4000 – Every bit as good as the jaw dropping D600 ISO 6400 looks better than ISO 1600 on the 5D Mark II to my eyes Gorgeous detail and pleasant bokeh even at ISO 2000 One quick pass in Noiseware or Dfine and it’s as clean as ISO 100 ISO 1250 has great detail and color with no objectionable noise ISO 12,800 looks as good as the Nikon D600 to me You can visit to see more of my test images which includes both real world and studio images. They are literally point and shoot shots usually in auto white balance (AWB) with Auto ISO and either Aperture Priority (most common) or Manual. The images you see below that weren’t shot in a studio are real world shots with NO flash, filters or enhancements.
This camera creates some delicious images that seem to even out perform the 5D Mark III at the highest ISO’s. My hope was that we’d get a 6D that was a cheaper version of the 5D Mark III, but where would the corners be cut to reduce the price? Sample Images – Yeah, this sensor rocks! However the 5D Mark III was nearly $1500 USD more than the D600 when I did my 5DM3 vs D600 comparison article, so it was tough to deny the value of the D600. Now as a Canon shooter, I am very fond of my 5D Mark III which I declared as the best camera for parents due to its great high ISO performance and advanced auto focus performance (an area where the D600 is very weak by comparison). When I got my review unit of the 6D from B&H, I wondered – would it be Canon’s answer to the D600? Now that’s not to say it was the best camera made, but when you consider price, performance and features, it was a pretty tough camera to beat. I’ll admit it, until I tested the new Canon 6D, the Nikon D600 was my camera of the year for 2012.